Memories in the aftermath of armed conflicts remain highly contested. They become politically utilized, while a critical engagement with such memories become essential to building democratic and inclusive society. As a result of the political exploitation of memory and the construction of it, a dominant master narrative is developed, which marginalizes and silences diverse civilian memories and multi-perspectivity of it.
Memories in the aftermath of armed conflicts remain highly contested. They become politically utilized, while a critical engagement with such memories become essential to building democratic and inclusive society. As a result of the political exploitation of memory and the construction of it, a dominant master narrative is developed, which marginalizes and silences diverse civilian memories and multi-perspectivity of it.
-->-->
